Friday, March 27, 2015

Why did you visit Detroit?!

Why did you visit Detroit?!   

The Gist


Monument to Joe Louis in Detroit's Hart Plaza
Taken by yours truly five years ago
The word 'Detroit' has become synonymous with white flight, urban decay and America's fall as the world's manufacturer. Interestingly, the city has also become known for its urban innovation and gritty fighting spirit (appropriately, there is a sculpture of boxer Joe Louis' fist on the riverfront). The city is still home to three major sports teams, a world-class art museum, and is producing hip new companies like popular the Shinola watch company. Brand new restaurants, bars selling local craft beer, and local shops are popping up monthly (if not weekly). Although Detroit has exited bankruptcy (the largest municipal bankruptcy in American history) last year, the state has imposed several layers of financial oversight to make sure they don't screw up again. For all the talk of a resurgent Detroit, however, many in the city's African-American community feel left outAs is almost always the case with gentrification, the effect of a resurgent city center is a replacing of a city's traditional population (almost always black or brown) for a young, rich, white population. The minute you see a white man with a baby, your city has made it. The lack of African-Americans in the city's new, cool hot spots led one commentator to quip, "I [didn't] expect in a city that is 83 percent black to be in a crowded Detroit establishment and having nearly everyone be as white as me."...and now you know the gist. 

Monday, March 9, 2015

Abu Dhabi, The Gaurdian, and Human Rights

Abu Dhabi, The Gaurdian, and Human Rights  

The Gist



The Guardian ran an article hailing Jean Nouvel’s Abu Dhabi Louvre museum as an architectural masterpiece. The author goes on to say that, although "nothing excuses the inhuman working conditions" that Human Rights Watch says it took to build the structure, nothing should deter us from celebrating "an eye-opening new museum."  Are you joking?! To say that the architectural merit of a building is enough to overlook the grave human rights abuses it took to build because, "fifty years from now, when the Louvre Abu Dhabi has established itself as one of the world’s great museums, how clearly will its dark beginnings be remembered?" is ridiculous. The same fawning over a country simply because they are starting to do things like us is nothing new (think the Shah's Iran, Saddam's Iraq, and Sadat's Egypt). In fact, the same was said when the Tehran Museum of Contemporary Art opened in 1977 (still the holder of the largest collection of Western art outside of the US and Europe). Yes, Mr. Nouvel's work is incredible and groundbreaking, but the Guardian should know better than to say that this "audacious new museum will be admired...as it should be" regardless of "the inhuman working conditions" it took to build....and now you know the gist. 

Sunday, March 8, 2015

The Economics of International Women's Day

The Economics of International Women's Day  

The Gist


March 8th is International Women's Day. International anything days do very little, for sure, but the point of this day is very important. Forbes recently, and the Economist previously, highlighted the importance of women to the world economy. Evidence suggests that women are more likely to reinvest their profits in education, their family, and community. According to the United Nations, "an estimated $16 trillion in global output is currently 'invisible,' of which $11 trillion is estimated to be produced by women." Research by the International Monetary Fund shows that women (unlike men) who are given more access to capital use it to contribute directly to their children's development. This, in turn, indirectly adds to a nation's income growth. In the developing world, where agriculture is the economic mainstay, 43% of all farming and almost 100% (surprise surprise) of all household work is done by women. So, in a nutshell, women do more to keep the world going (and fed, nurtured, and healthy) than men....and now you know the gist. 

Sunday, March 1, 2015

A Museum Expansion, the Astrodome, and Oil

A Museum Expansion, the Astrodome, and Oil. 

The Gist


A rendition of the eastern part of the new design
Image: Lake|Flato Architects.
The city of Houston has never had a reputation as the prettiest, nicest, or most cultured city in the country. It is undoubtedly the energy capital of the world (instead of being the Dubai of the Gulf of Mexico, Dubai is the Houston of the Persian Gulf). Although the price of oil keeps tumbling, the tremendous amount of petrodollars pouring into the city is a boon for Houston's cultural institutions. Already the largest museum in Texas, the Museum of Fine Arts will soon become one of the largest museum campuses in the United States. The MFAH recently announced its $450 million, of which $330 million has already been raised, expansion. The plan is meant to transform the entire museum district into a cohesive, pedestrian friendly, student populated environment. The plan includes three new buildings connected by landscaped walkways, a tony new restaurant, and moving all parking underground. Although widely praised and supported, the plan is not without its detractors with one critic questioning if the expansion is more  “related to the prestige of the institution [rather than] the civic pride of the community.” The demolition of the Seth Irvin Morris-designed  Glassell School of Art building, in particular, is seen as an unnecessary destruction of the city's architectural identity (another Morris-designed building on the chopping block: the Astrodome). The entire plan is intended to transform Houston into one of the premier art centers in the country, you know, as long as OPEC gets it together and stops flooding the oil market...and now you know the gist. 

Sunday, February 1, 2015

World Hijab Day, Evangelicals, and Michelle Obama

World Hijab Day, Evangelicals, and Michelle Obama 

The Gist


Today is the first annual World Hijab DayEveryone who has been to Houston's Galleria Mall has seen women in varying degrees of hijab with their expensive handbags, shoes and jewelry (ah, petrodollars). Interestingly, dressing modestly is required for both men and women in Islam (which is why it is ridiculously annoying when you see a woman, covered head to foot, and her husband wearing shorts, a ratty T-shirt and flip flops): "Tell the believing men to lower their gaze and be modest." For the most part, women say they voluntarily wear their headscarves; it makes them feel modest, safe, and free. Female reporters who have covered the Middle East for decades note that the headscarf can send different signals at different times. During the Iranian Revolution, women wore them as a sign, not of piety, but of defiance against the Shah's regime. Iran (see women in picture) and Saudi Arabia require some form of head covering for their female citizens, while Turkey only recently lifted its ban on headcoverings in universitiesRecently, First Lady Michelle Obama made headlines for not wearing a headscarf while visiting Riyadh. She didn't actually make any statement (scores of Western first ladies and leaders have gone without the scarf because there is no law that makes them) and, even if she did, it would be of no help to the millions of Saudi women who don't get the choice to wear or not to wear a headcovering. Modesty for female dress can be found in every religion (and yes, I am including the Evangelical Christian call for women to dress modestly to 'help their fellow Christian brothers out'). What differentiates the Islamic headdress is that many women around get told how they want to express their piety by others...and now you know the gist. 

Tuesday, January 27, 2015

The Holocaust and the Righteous Among Nations.

The Holocaust and the Righteous Among Nations.  

The Gist


Today is Holocaust Memorial Day. Eleven million people were slaughtered at the hands of the Nazis (six million European Jews and five million homosexuals, Roma, Jehovah's Witnesses, Slavs, mentally disabled persons and other so-called 'undesirables'). For the most part, the world did nothing. The most blatant example of world inaction was at the 1938 Evian Conference. The conference was called BECAUSE world leaders knew that Europe's Jews were in trouble. Yet, the United States and Great Britain REFUSED to increase their immigration quotas. At one point, the US State Department tried to keep reports of Nazi atrocities out of the press.The fact that governments didn't do anything, however, didn't stop hundreds upon hundreds of being what Israel has dubbed The Righteous Among the Nations. Stories of Albanian Muslims, Bosnian Muslims, Turkish Muslims, and Iranian Muslims saving Jews are especially poignant. Recently, Human of New York interviewed a man who said the following, 


"Moral absolutism keeps us from learning from the past. It's easy to say: 'Hitler was a demon. Nazis were all bad seeds.' That's simple. It's much harder to say: 'Is that humanity? Is that me?'" 

Although a bit melodramatic, it is important to realize that the death of 11 million fellow humans could easily have happened under out watch (think Rwanda, where one million people died in 100 days, while we did nothing)....and now you know the gist. 

Friday, January 23, 2015

Bipartisanship, a Marathon, and King Abudullah

Bipartisanship, a Marathon, and King Abudullah 

The Gist


President Obama said he had the courage of his convictions and President Bush said he was a force of modernization. My favorite, however, came from former Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel who said King Abdullah was, "a powerful voice for tolerance, moderation and peace." King Abdullah ruled a country that lashes bloggers for defending an atheist (obviously he was a peaceful man). Women are outright banned from certain professions, driving, most sports, and need to get male permission to travel abroad and obtain certain medical procedures (obviously King Abdullah was a modernizer). Saudi Arabia forbids public worship of any religion other than Islam (obviously King Abdullah was tolerant). According to a leaked memo by former Secretary of State Clinton, Saudi donors constituted “the most significant source of funding to Sunni terrorist groups worldwide." Our country's love for tyrants that benefit our interests is certainly nothing new: the Shah of Iran, Mobutu Sese Seko of then-Zaire, Suharto of Indonesia to name a few. But the praise lavished by CNN, Fox News, NPR, MSNBC and others is ridiculous. I guess it shouldn't come as a surprise: Houston's half marathon is sponsored by Saudi Aramco and large wings of top American institutions are named after Saudi royalty. Our foreign policy still seems to adhere to Secretary of State Kissinger's oft repeated quote, "he is a bastard, but he is our bastard." ...and now you know the gist.